[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALPaoCj3h=ELzRwUB2FcPAFAMD7G_nq1-r=PUGOuLq38bUMr0g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 10:53:47 +0200
From: Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
carl@...amperecomputing.com, lcherian@...vell.com,
bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com, tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com,
xingxin.hx@...nanolis.org, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>, dfustini@...libre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/24] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_arch_rmid_read() retry
when it is interrupted
Hi James,
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 8:03 PM James Morse <james.morse@....com> wrote:
>
> resctrl_arch_rmid_read() could be called by resctrl in process context,
> and then called by the PMU driver from irq context on the same CPU.
Will there be x86 PMU changes to do this or is this only ARM? I just
want to make sure the x86 resctrl_arch_rmid_read() changes are
actually needed.
Thanks!
-Peter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists