linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] ASoC: mediatek: mt8188-mt6359: Use bitfield macros for registers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f4547bf6-5e95-331b-5d8e-b6d71209859d@baylibre.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Jun 2023 12:00:53 +0200
From:   Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@...libre.com>
To:     AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, broonie@...nel.org
Cc:     lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
        matthias.bgg@...il.com, trevor.wu@...iatek.com,
        dan.carpenter@...aro.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ASoC: mediatek: mt8188-mt6359: Use bitfield macros
 for registers

On 08/06/2023 11:57, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>>> -    int test_done_1, test_done_2;
>>> +    u8 test_done_1, test_done_2;
>>>       int cycle_1, cycle_2;
>>
>> Shouldn't be unsigned too ?
>>
>> I'm wondering if it would be better (probably in another patch) to 
>> change the data type of the other variables too, to match their 
>> use-case. (maybe it's already the case, I'm just wondering)
>>
> 
> In theory, yes, cycle_1 and 2 should be unsigned, but the signedness of 
> this
> variable is getting used in the calibration logic later, as in the for loop
> they are both being reinitialized to -1 ... so I couldn't just switch 
> 'em to
> unsigned.

Understood, thanks for your explanation.

-- 
Regards,
Alexandre