[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230608160230.GB352940@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 12:02:30 -0400
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@...il.com>
Cc: vitaly.wool@...sulko.com, minchan@...nel.org,
senozhatsky@...omium.org, yosryahmed@...gle.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, ddstreet@...e.org, sjenning@...hat.com,
nphamcs@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/7] mm: zswap: remove page reclaim logic from zbud
Hi Domenico,
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 04:56:06PM +0200, Domenico Cerasuolo wrote:
> With the recent enhancement to zswap enabling direct page writeback, the
> need for the shrink code in zbud has become obsolete. As a result, this
> commit removes the page reclaim logic from zbud entirely.
>
> Signed-off-by: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@...il.com>
I find the changelog a bit difficult to understand. How about:
Switch zbud to the new generic zswap LRU and remove its custom
implementation.
> @@ -585,7 +425,7 @@ static struct zpool_driver zbud_zpool_driver = {
> .destroy = zbud_zpool_destroy,
> .malloc = zbud_zpool_malloc,
> .free = zbud_zpool_free,
> - .shrink = zbud_zpool_shrink,
> + .shrink = NULL,
> .map = zbud_zpool_map,
> .unmap = zbud_zpool_unmap,
> .total_size = zbud_zpool_total_size,
Like Minchan pointed out in the zsmalloc patch, you can just remove
the line as the member is NULL by default.
With that, please add:
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists