linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 9/9] drm: Remove superfluous print statements in DRM core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 09 Jun 2023 18:42:03 +0530
From:   Siddh Raman Pant <code@...dh.me>
To:     "Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Maxime Ripard" <mripard@...nel.org>,
        "Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        "David Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>,
        "Daniel Vetter" <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        "Andrzej Hajda" <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
        "Neil Armstrong" <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
        "Robert Foss" <rfoss@...nel.org>,
        "Laurent Pinchart" <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        "Jonas Karlman" <jonas@...boo.se>,
        "Jernej Skrabec" <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        "Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "dri-devel" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Suraj Upadhyay" <usuraj35@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 9/9] drm: Remove superfluous print statements in DRM
 core

On Wed, 07 Jun 2023 00:00:10 +0530, Siddh Raman Pant wrote:
> There are a couple of superfluous print statements using the drm_*
> macros, which do stuff like printing newlines, print OOM messages
> (OOM while allocating memory is already supposed to be noisy), and
> printing strings like "Initialised" with no extra info whatsoever.
> 
> Thus, remove a couple of these superfluous strings.
> 
> Suggested-by: Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>
> Signed-off-by: Siddh Raman Pant code@...dh.me>

This patch is the only one introducing these changes additionally,
no other patch content has been changed from v9 and sent for merge.
I should have clarified this in the cover.

This patch may or may not be dropped, courtesy follow-up discussion on
v9 regarding it: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87jzwfu1wf.fsf@intel.com/

Thanks,
Siddh