| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <64833f16.050a0220.5c39c.20ce@mx.google.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 17:02:44 +0200
From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>, rafael@...nel.org,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org,
konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, ilia.lin@...nel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: qcom-nvmem: add support for
IPQ8064
On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 05:53:40PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 at 17:21, Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 06:07:17PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > On 31/05/2023 04:36, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 05:03:01AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > > On 30/05/2023 19:58, Robert Marko wrote:
> > > > > > From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > IPQ8064 comes in 3 families:
> > > > > > * IPQ8062 up to 1.0GHz
> > > > > > * IPQ8064/IPQ8066/IPQ8068 up to 1.4GHz
> > > > > > * IPQ8065/IPQ8069 up to 1.7Ghz
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So, in order to be able to share one OPP table, add support for
> > > > > > IPQ8064 family based of SMEM SoC ID-s as speedbin fuse is always 0 on
> > > > > > IPQ8064.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bit are set with the following logic:
> > > > > > * IPQ8062 BIT 0
> > > > > > * IPQ8064/IPQ8066/IPQ8068 BIT 1
> > > > > > * IPQ8065/IPQ8069 BIT 2
> > > > > >
> > > > > > speed is never fused, only psv values are fused.
> > > > > > Set speed to the versions to permit a unified opp table following
> > > > > > this named opp:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > opp-microvolt-speed<SPEED_VALUE>-pvs<PSV_VALUE>-v0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Example:
> > > > > > - for ipq8062 psv2
> > > > > > opp-microvolt-speed0-pvs2-v0 = < 925000 878750 971250>
> > > > > > - for ipq8064 psv2
> > > > > > opp-microvolt-speed2-pvs2-v0 = <925000 878750 971250>;
> > > > > > - for ipq8065 psv2
> > > > > > opp-microvolt-speed4-pvs2-v0 = <950000 902500 997500>;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
> > > > > > index ce444b5962f2..c644138680ba 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
> > > > > > @@ -34,6 +34,10 @@
> > > > > > #define IPQ8074_HAWKEYE_VERSION BIT(0)
> > > > > > #define IPQ8074_ACORN_VERSION BIT(1)
> > > > > > +#define IPQ8062_VERSION BIT(0)
> > > > > > +#define IPQ8064_VERSION BIT(1)
> > > > > > +#define IPQ8065_VERSION BIT(2)
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it would be more logical to change these defines to consecutive enum
> > > > > instead of BIT(n) values. Another (and better in my opinion) option is to
> > > > > drop versions completely (and remove speedN from the opp names) and to have
> > > > > per-SoC tables in per-SoC dtsi files. There are already separate
> > > > > ipq8064.dtsi, ipq8062.dtsi and ipq8065.dtsi files. It makes little sense to
> > > > > overcomplicate the OPP tables.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > That is what was used downstream but it was also wrong and against the
> > > > normal implementation of this driver itself.
> > > >
> > > > OPP have opp-supported-hw just for the task with the principle of
> > > > declaring a single table in dtsi and automatically select the right one.
> > > >
> > > > Using the implementation downstream (opp table in each dtsi) is actually
> > > > worse as ipq8065 have 1.4ghz and not 1.2ghz and that can correctly be
> > > > handled with opp-supported-hw (and this change) or using delete-property
> > > > in dtsi (that I don't really like and it's ugly)
> > > >
> > > > Also this implementation would match what is currently secribed for the
> > > > use of OPP in the documentation.
> > > >
> > > > Hope you can understand the reason of this change, the intention is to
> > > > clear and trying to use standard OPP stuff instead of hacks in the DTS.
> > >
> > > I'm fine with the opp-supported-hw part (I forgot that it is used by default
> > > with the help of drv->versions). I do not like the idea of encoding the same
> > > value into the -speedN part. If it is not needed, it's better be dropped
> > > than using a semi-dummy value there.
> > >
> > > So, I'd suggest to define an enum, use BIT(enum_value) for drv->versions and
> > > drop the speed%d part.
> > >
> > > Also, while we are at it, could you please define a schema for your opp
> > > extensions? An example would make it easier to understand the bindings (and
> > > will also provide a reference for possible other implementers).
> > >
> >
> > Sorry for the delay in answering this.
> >
> > The speed part is still needed... since the voltage for each voltage
> > change on the different SoC.
> >
> > Let me give you an example for one freq.
> >
> > opp-384000000 {
> > opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <384000000>;
> > opp-microvolt-speed0-pvs0-v0 = <1000000 950000 1050000>;
> > opp-microvolt-speed0-pvs1-v0 = <925000 878750 971250>;
> > opp-microvolt-speed0-pvs2-v0 = <875000 831250 918750>;
> > opp-microvolt-speed0-pvs3-v0 = <800000 760000 840000>;
> > opp-microvolt-speed2-pvs0-v0 = <1000000 950000 1050000>;
> > opp-microvolt-speed2-pvs1-v0 = <925000 878750 971250>;
> > opp-microvolt-speed2-pvs2-v0 = <875000 831250 918750>;
> > opp-microvolt-speed2-pvs3-v0 = <800000 760000 840000>;
> > opp-microvolt-speed4-pvs0-v0 = <975000 926250 1023750>;
> > opp-microvolt-speed4-pvs1-v0 = <950000 902500 997500>;
> > opp-microvolt-speed4-pvs2-v0 = <925000 878750 971250>;
> > opp-microvolt-speed4-pvs3-v0 = <900000 855000 945000>;
> > opp-microvolt-speed4-pvs4-v0 = <875000 831250 918750>;
> > opp-microvolt-speed4-pvs5-v0 = <825000 783750 866250>;
> > opp-microvolt-speed4-pvs6-v0 = <775000 736250 813750>;
> > opp-supported-hw = <0x7>;
> > clock-latency-ns = <100000>;
> > };
>
> What about (it will require changes to opp-v2-base.yaml):
>
> opp-384000000-0 {
> opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <384000000>;
> opp-microvolt-pvs0-v0 = <1000000 950000 1050000>;
> opp-microvolt-pvs1-v0 = <925000 878750 971250>;
> opp-microvolt-pvs2-v0 = <875000 831250 918750>;
> opp-microvolt-pvs3-v0 = <800000 760000 840000>;
> opp-supported-hw = <0x1>;
> clock-latency-ns = <100000>;
> };
>
> opp-384000000-1 {
> opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <384000000>;
> opp-microvolt-pvs0-v0 = <1000000 950000 1050000>;
> opp-microvolt-pvs1-v0 = <925000 878750 971250>;
> opp-microvolt-pvs2-v0 = <875000 831250 918750>;
> opp-microvolt-pvs3-v0 = <800000 760000 840000>;
> opp-supported-hw = <0x2>;
> clock-latency-ns = <100000>;
> };
>
> opp-384000000-2 {
> opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <384000000>;
> opp-microvolt-pvs0-v0 = <975000 926250 1023750>;
> opp-microvolt-pvs1-v0 = <950000 902500 997500>;
> opp-microvolt-pvs2-v0 = <925000 878750 971250>;
> opp-microvolt-pvs3-v0 = <900000 855000 945000>;
> opp-microvolt-pvs4-v0 = <875000 831250 918750>;
> opp-microvolt-pvs5-v0 = <825000 783750 866250>;
> opp-microvolt-pvs6-v0 = <775000 736250 813750>;
> opp-supported-hw = <0x4>;
> clock-latency-ns = <100000>;
> };
>
>
Mhhhhhh is it really worth it? Would also require to modify the pattern
currently used in the qcom-cpufreq-nvmem that is speedXX-pvsXX-vXX.
ipq806x is really krait cpu not correctly fused. I expect downstream the
same pattern to be used widely with other krait based systems so the
idea was to not reinvent the wheel. (introducing a different pattern
also means additional condition in the schema)
If we really don't want to have big opp table in one dtsi I can consider
redefining the same opp table in the different dtsi. (the
opp-supported-hw was really needed for the 1.2ghz problem, if asked I
can still split the table in the related dtsi but I don't really like
it)
Anyway I'm open to both solution.
If it's ok to change the pattern I would change it directly to something
like opp-microvolt-pvs since even pvs version is always 0.
I'm honestly against the idea of defining multiple opp-table for the
same freq (and also change the base schema) since we can do the same
thing by just overwriting the table in the other dtsi.
> > As you can see we use the speed value to match the different SoC and
> > apply the correct voltage.
> >
> > Yes I will add the missing info in the schema.
> >
> > > >
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > struct qcom_cpufreq_drv;
> > > > > > struct qcom_cpufreq_match_data {
> > > > > > @@ -207,6 +211,69 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_krait_name_version(struct device *cpu_dev,
> > > > > > return ret;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > +static int qcom_cpufreq_ipq8064_name_version(struct device *cpu_dev,
> > > > > > + struct nvmem_cell *speedbin_nvmem,
> > > > > > + char **pvs_name,
> > > > > > + struct qcom_cpufreq_drv *drv)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + int speed = 0, pvs = 0, pvs_ver = 0;
> > > > > > + int msm_id, ret = 0;
> > > > > > + u8 *speedbin;
> > > > > > + size_t len;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + speedbin = nvmem_cell_read(speedbin_nvmem, &len);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (IS_ERR(speedbin))
> > > > > > + return PTR_ERR(speedbin);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + switch (len) {
> > > > > > + case 4:
> > > > > > + get_krait_bin_format_a(cpu_dev, &speed, &pvs, &pvs_ver,
> > > > > > + speedbin);
> > > > > > + break;
> > > > > > + default:
> > > > > > + dev_err(cpu_dev, "Unable to read nvmem data. Defaulting to 0!\n");
> > > > > > + ret = -ENODEV;
> > > > > > + goto len_error;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + ret = qcom_smem_get_soc_id(&msm_id);
> > > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + switch (msm_id) {
> > > > > > + case QCOM_ID_IPQ8062:
> > > > > > + drv->versions = IPQ8062_VERSION;
> > > > > > + break;
> > > > > > + case QCOM_ID_IPQ8064:
> > > > > > + case QCOM_ID_IPQ8066:
> > > > > > + case QCOM_ID_IPQ8068:
> > > > > > + drv->versions = IPQ8064_VERSION;
> > > > > > + break;
> > > > > > + case QCOM_ID_IPQ8065:
> > > > > > + case QCOM_ID_IPQ8069:
> > > > > > + drv->versions = IPQ8065_VERSION;
> > > > > > + break;
> > > > > > + default:
> > > > > > + dev_err(cpu_dev,
> > > > > > + "SoC ID %u is not part of IPQ8064 family, limiting to 1.0GHz!\n",
> > > > > > + msm_id);
> > > > > > + drv->versions = IPQ8062_VERSION;
> > > > > > + break;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > + * IPQ8064 speed is never fused. Only psv values are fused.
> > > > > > + * Set speed to the versions to permit a unified opp table.
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > + snprintf(*pvs_name, sizeof("speedXX-pvsXX-vXX"), "speed%d-pvs%d-v%d",
> > > > > > + drv->versions, pvs, pvs_ver);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +len_error:
> > > > > > + kfree(speedbin);
> > > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > static int qcom_cpufreq_ipq8074_name_version(struct device *cpu_dev,
> > > > > > struct nvmem_cell *speedbin_nvmem,
> > > > > > char **pvs_name,
>
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
--
Ansuel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists