linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] iscsi_ibft: Fix finding the iBFT under Xen Dom 0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <74ec3164-1d1d-7546-6008-9d028354e50a@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Jun 2023 08:32:23 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     konrad@...nok.org, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc:     Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@...rix.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] iscsi_ibft: Fix finding the iBFT under Xen Dom 0

On 6/9/23 08:22, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Dave, are you OK with the change in where the reserve call is made?

The move makes logical sense.  I'm not 100% confident it won't regress
anything, but the blast radius should be limited to iSCSI.  But, yeah,
I'm OK with it.