[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230608172722.d32733db433d385daa6c11a0@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 17:27:22 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...ru>, vbabka@...e.cz,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org, djwong@...nel.org,
hughd@...gle.com, paulmck@...nel.org, muchun.song@...ux.dev,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zhengqi.arch@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] fs: Use delayed shrinker unregistration
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 09:17:54 +1000 Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:
> > Given that we're at -rc5 now, and the file system folks didn't get
> > consulted until fairly late in the progress, and the fact that this
> > may cause use-after-free problems that could lead to security issues,
> > perhaps we shoould consider reverting the SRCU changeover now, and try
> > again for the next merge window?
>
> Yes, please, because I think we can fix this in a much better way
> and make things a whole lot simpler at the same time.
Qi Zheng, if agreeable could you please prepare and send reverts of
475733dda5a ("mm: vmscan: add shrinker_srcu_generation") and of
f95bdb700bc6bb74 ("mm: vmscan: make global slab shrink lockless")?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists