[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZIMu/GzBZQ1EmiZ0@tpad>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 10:54:04 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/idle: disable tick in idle=poll idle entry
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 10:34:00AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 10:10:46PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >
> > Commit a5183862e76fdc25f36b39c2489b816a5c66e2e5
> > ("tick/nohz: Conditionally restart tick on idle exit") allows
> > a nohz_full CPU to enter idle and return from it with the
> > scheduler tick disabled (since the tick might be undesired noise).
> >
> > The idle=poll case still unconditionally restarts the tick when entering
> > idle.
> >
> > To reduce the noise for that case as well, stop the tick when entering
> > idle, for the idle=poll case.
> >
> > tick_nohz_idle_exit (called if the NEED_RESCHED bit is set)
> > is responsible for re-enabling the tick when necessary.
>
> Who cares and why?
Systems that use isolcpus/nohz_full, and use idle=poll to avoid sleeping.
For example:
https://github.com/intel/FlexRAN/blob/master/README.md
More specifically, the case which HLTs (via nanosleep usually) is:
https://www.isa.org/intech-home/2022/february-2022/departments/what-you-may-not-know-about-softplcs
Can add this to the next version of the patch (unless you have any other
comments).
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists