linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH liburing v1 0/2] Fixes for io_uring_for_each

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 8 Jun 2023 21:02:10 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>
Cc:     Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <alviro.iskandar@...weeb.org>,
        GNU/Weeb Mailing List <gwml@...r.gnuweeb.org>,
        Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
        io-uring Mailing List <io-uring@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH liburing v1 0/2] Fixes for io_uring_for_each_cqe

On 6/8/23 7:54 PM, Ammar Faizi wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> 
> Please consider taking these last-minute fixes for liburing-2.4
> release. There are two patches in this series:
> 
> ## 1. man/io_uring_for_each_cqe: Fix return value, title, and typo
> 
>   - Fix the return value. io_uring_for_each_cqe() doesn't return an int.
> 
>   - Fix the title, it was io_uring_wait_cqes(), it should be
>     io_uring_for_each_cqe().
> 
>   - Fix typo: s/io_uring_for_each_cqes/io_uring_for_each_cqe/.
> 
> ## 2. Explicitly tell it's a macro and add an example
> 
> Let the reader directly know that it's not a function, but a macro.
> Also, give a simple example of its usage.

Applied, even though not super critical for release. But this should
be it, I'll announce 2.4 tomorrow.

-- 
Jens Axboe