[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230609162046.13d19398@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 16:20:46 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mhiramat@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, kpsingh@...nel.org, xukuohai@...weicloud.com,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Ftrace direct call samples improvements
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 16:06:58 +0200
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org> wrote:
> This series is a subset of [1] that didn't go through the arm64 tree.
>
> - The first patch fixes a small bug when a direct call sample is loaded on x86
> - The second patch adds arm64 support to all direct calls samples
>
> They are sent together because the second one depends on the first one.
>
> This series applies cleanly on Linus's master branch. It needs the first two
> patches of [1] which, at the time of writing, don't seem to have made it to the
> trace/linux-trace tree but I suppose they could be pulled from Linus's master
>
> 1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230405180250.2046566-1-revest@chromium.org/
>
> Florent Revest (2):
> samples: ftrace: Save required argument registers in sample
> trampolines
> arm64: ftrace: Add direct call trampoline samples support
Is this going through the arm64 tree, or should it go through mine?
-- Steve
>
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 2 ++
> samples/ftrace/ftrace-direct-modify.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++
> samples/ftrace/ftrace-direct-multi-modify.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++
> samples/ftrace/ftrace-direct-multi.c | 24 +++++++++++++
> samples/ftrace/ftrace-direct-too.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++----
> samples/ftrace/ftrace-direct.c | 24 +++++++++++++
> 6 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists