[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230609213404.GB2012@templeofstupid.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 14:34:04 -0700
From: Krister Johansen <kjlx@...pleofstupid.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@...a.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: add a test for subprogram
extables
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 08:52:36PM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
> On 6/8/23 5:11 PM, Krister Johansen wrote:
> > In certain situations a program with subprograms may have a NULL
> > extable entry. This should not happen, and when it does, it turns a
> > single trap into multiple. Add a test case for further debugging and to
> > prevent regressions. N.b: without any other patches this can panic or
> > oops a kernel.
>
> It would be great if you can add the panic call stack in the commit message.
>
> Please also mention that three identical bpf programs in the test
> significantly increased the 'oops' chance. Just one program may
> not be able to trigger the issue.
Apologies, I mistakenly put the oops in the cover letter when you did tell
me to put it in the commit message for this patch. That is fixed now.
> > Signed-off-by: Krister Johansen <kjlx@...pleofstupid.com>
> > ---
> > .../bpf/prog_tests/subprogs_extable.c | 31 +++++++++++++
> > .../bpf/progs/test_subprogs_extable.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/subprogs_extable.c
> > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_subprogs_extable.c
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/subprogs_extable.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/subprogs_extable.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..2201988274a4
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/subprogs_extable.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +#include <test_progs.h>
> > +#include "test_subprogs_extable.skel.h"
> > +
> > +void test_subprogs_extable(void)
> > +{
> > + const int READ_SZ = 456;
>
> There is no need to use uppercase for READ_SZ.
> Just do
> const int read_sz = 456;
> is sufficient.
>
> > + struct test_subprogs_extable *skel;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + skel = test_subprogs_extable__open();
> > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open"))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + err = test_subprogs_extable__load(skel);
> > + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "skel_load"))
> > + goto cleanup;
>
> You can combine the above open and load with a single one
> test_subprogs_extable__open_and_load().
>
> > +
> > + err = test_subprogs_extable__attach(skel);
> > + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "skel_attach"))
> > + goto cleanup;
> > +
> > + /* trigger tracepoint */
> > + ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_read(READ_SZ), "trigger_read");
>
> I think we should at least ensure that the program is triggered. For
> example, add a global variable 'triggered' in the program and
> triggered will be set to 1 in the program if the program is running.
> Here check
> skel->bss->triggered
> must be 1.
Thanks for the additional feedback on cleaning this up. I've
incorporated the requested changes and will send out a v4 shortly.
-K
Powered by blists - more mailing lists