[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230609151111.bb7908254853a0879db07746@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 15:11:11 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>,
ying.huang@...el.com, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Khalid Aziz <khalid@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mm, compaction: Skip all non-migratable pages during
scan
On Tue, 30 May 2023 09:42:33 -0600 Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com> wrote:
> > I completely agree that we should be careful with such mapcount vs. pagecount checks, and if we can use something
> > better, let's use something *better*.
>
> When we have a reliable folio_maybe_dma_longterm_pinned() function, it will be better to call that instead of doing
> refcount vs mapcount check. Until that better function to check for pinned pages is in place, may I propose that the
> current patch fixes a customer problem though not optimally and is a good enough working solution. When a better
> function is in place, page_has_extra_refs() function can be updated to rely on this other function instead of refcount
> vs mapcount.
We seem rather stuck with this patch. I think I'll drop it while we
ponder a way forward.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists