[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZIOzE4f2xr9CCA45@telecaster>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 16:17:39 -0700
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-debuggers@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/unwind/orc: add ELF section with ORC version number
On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 03:48:03PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 03:24:38PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > > Though, instead of
> > > using an incrementing version, Peter had the idea to hash the struct,
> > > like:
> > >
> > > awk '/^struct orc_entry {$/ { p=1 } p { print } /^}/ { p=0 }' arch/x86/include/asm/orc_types.h | sha1sum
> > >
> > > That way we don't have to remember to bump the version number, and it
> > > would be more resilient to partial backports in distros.
> > >
> > > Would something like that work for you?
> >
> > Any sort of unique identifier works for me. One thing that the proposed
> > hash wouldn't catch is if ORC_REG_* or ORC_TYPE_* are ever renumbered
> > (i.e., the meanings of existing values change). It also wouldn't catch
> > if something about the .orc_unwind_ip section changed. But assuming
> > changes like that would be much rarer, it could be handled manually by
> > bumping a "salt" for the hash. E.g., by adding 'BEGIN { print <SALT> }'
> > to the awk script:
> >
> > awk 'BEGIN { print 1 } /^struct orc_entry {$/ { p=1 } p { print } /^}/ { p=0 }' arch/x86/include/asm/orc_types.h | sha1sum
> >
> > I'll defer to you guys whether it's easier to remember to bump a version
> > everytime or only in those rare cases.
>
> I think I'd prefer only bumping it in the rare cases, because we're
> going to end up forgetting either way ;-)
>
> To catch REG/TYPE changes, we could forego awk and just hash the whole
> file, the only downside being that it might introduce unnecessary
> changes if we change a comment or something. But the file changes
> rarely enough.
>
> Or we could tweak the awk to also print ORC_{REG,TYPE}_* pretty easily.
Printing ORC_{REG,TYPE}_* should cover almost everything, and if there's
anything not covered, it can be handled manually, so that sounds good to
me. I'll draft a patch doing that.
Thanks,
Omar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists