[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <504c702c-b31a-a9d4-22a0-8a09547d30e5@bytedance.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 11:19:03 +0800
From: Hao Jia <jiahao.os@...edance.com>
To: Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] sched/core: Avoid multiple calling
update_rq_clock() in unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs()
On 2023/6/9 Benjamin Segall wrote:
> Hao Jia <jiahao.os@...edance.com> writes:
>
>> This WARN_DOUBLE_CLOCK warning is triggered during cpu offline.
>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> rq->clock_update_flags & RQCF_UPDATED
>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3323 at kernel/sched/core.c:741
>> update_rq_clock+0xaf/0x180
>> Call Trace:
>> <TASK>
>> unthrottle_cfs_rq+0x4b/0x300
>> rq_offline_fair+0x89/0x90
>> set_rq_offline.part.118+0x28/0x60
>> rq_attach_root+0xc4/0xd0
>> cpu_attach_domain+0x3dc/0x7f0
>> partition_sched_domains_locked+0x2a5/0x3c0
>> rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x477/0x830
>> rebuild_sched_domains+0x1b/0x30
>> cpuset_hotplug_workfn+0x2ca/0xc90
>> ? balance_push+0x56/0xf0
>> ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x15/0x30
>> ? finish_task_switch+0x98/0x2f0
>> ? __switch_to+0x291/0x410
>> ? __schedule+0x65e/0x1310
>> process_one_work+0x1bc/0x3d0
>> worker_thread+0x4c/0x380
>> ? preempt_count_add+0x92/0xa0
>> ? rescuer_thread+0x310/0x310
>> kthread+0xe6/0x110
>> ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
>> ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>>
>> The rq clock has been updated before the set_rq_offline()
>> function runs, so we don't need to call update_rq_clock() in
>> unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs().
>
> I don't think we do in the path from rq_attach_root (though that's easy
> enough to fix, of course).
>
Thanks for your review.
Now our fix method is that after applying patch1, we update the rq clock
before set_rq_offline(). Then use rq_clock_{start, stop}_loop_update to
avoid updating the rq clock multiple times in unthrottle_cfs_rq().
Do you have any better suggestions?
Thanks,
Hao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists