[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230609050052.GA472607@hu-pkondeti-hyd.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 10:30:52 +0530
From: Pavan Kondeti <quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>
To: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@...cinc.com>
CC: <agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<rafael@...nel.org>, <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <maz@...nel.org>, <mani@...nel.org>,
<robimarko@...il.com>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] dt-bindings: cpufreq: cpufreq-qcom-hw: Add SDX75
compatible
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 05:17:48PM +0530, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
> Add compatible for EPSS CPUFREQ-HW on SDX75.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@...cinc.com>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.yaml | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.yaml
> index a6b3bb8..866ed2d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.yaml
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ properties:
> - qcom,sa8775p-cpufreq-epss
> - qcom,sc7280-cpufreq-epss
> - qcom,sc8280xp-cpufreq-epss
> + - qcom,sdx75-cpufreq-epss
> - qcom,sm6375-cpufreq-epss
> - qcom,sm8250-cpufreq-epss
> - qcom,sm8350-cpufreq-epss
This is a very basic question, not completely related to this patch.
Apologies in advance.
What is the rationale for adding a new soc string under compatible and
using it in the new soc device tree? Is it meant for documentation purpose?
i.e one know what all SoCs / boards supported by this device node.
I ask this because, we don't add these compatible strings in the driver
[1] which means there is not SoC specific handling and there is no
module load assist (module alias matching by user space based on device
presence).
Thanks,
Pavan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists