[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230609005158.2421285-3-surenb@google.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 17:51:54 -0700
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: willy@...radead.org, hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...e.com,
josef@...icpanda.com, jack@...e.cz, ldufour@...ux.ibm.com,
laurent.dufour@...ibm.com, michel@...pinasse.org,
liam.howlett@...cle.com, jglisse@...gle.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
minchan@...gle.com, dave@...olabs.net, punit.agrawal@...edance.com,
lstoakes@...il.com, hdanton@...a.com, apopple@...dia.com,
peterx@...hat.com, ying.huang@...el.com, david@...hat.com,
yuzhao@...gle.com, dhowells@...hat.com, hughd@...gle.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org,
pasha.tatashin@...een.com, surenb@...gle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/6] mm: handle swap page faults under VMA lock if page is uncontended
When page fault is handled under VMA lock protection, all swap page
faults are retried with mmap_lock because folio_lock_or_retry
implementation has to drop and reacquire mmap_lock if folio could
not be immediately locked.
Instead of retrying all swapped page faults, retry only when folio
locking fails.
Note that the only time do_swap_page calls synchronous swap_readpage
is when SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO is set, which is only set for
QUEUE_FLAG_SYNCHRONOUS devices: brd, zram and nvdimms (both btt and
pmem). Therefore we don't sleep in this path, and there's no need to
drop the mmap or per-vma lock.
Drivers implementing ops->migrate_to_ram might still rely on mmap_lock,
therefore fall back to mmap_lock in this case.
Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
---
mm/filemap.c | 6 ++++++
mm/memory.c | 14 +++++++++-----
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index b4c9bd368b7e..7cb0a3776a07 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -1706,6 +1706,8 @@ static int __folio_lock_async(struct folio *folio, struct wait_page_queue *wait)
* mmap_lock has been released (mmap_read_unlock(), unless flags had both
* FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY and FAULT_FLAG_RETRY_NOWAIT set, in
* which case mmap_lock is still held.
+ * If flags had FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK set, meaning the operation is performed
+ * with VMA lock only, the VMA lock is still held.
*
* If neither ALLOW_RETRY nor KILLABLE are set, will always return true
* with the folio locked and the mmap_lock unperturbed.
@@ -1713,6 +1715,10 @@ static int __folio_lock_async(struct folio *folio, struct wait_page_queue *wait)
bool __folio_lock_or_retry(struct folio *folio, struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned int flags)
{
+ /* Can't do this if not holding mmap_lock */
+ if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK)
+ return false;
+
if (fault_flag_allow_retry_first(flags)) {
/*
* CAUTION! In this case, mmap_lock is not released
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index f69fbc251198..41f45819a923 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3711,11 +3711,6 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
if (!pte_unmap_same(vmf))
goto out;
- if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK) {
- ret = VM_FAULT_RETRY;
- goto out;
- }
-
entry = pte_to_swp_entry(vmf->orig_pte);
if (unlikely(non_swap_entry(entry))) {
if (is_migration_entry(entry)) {
@@ -3725,6 +3720,15 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
vmf->page = pfn_swap_entry_to_page(entry);
ret = remove_device_exclusive_entry(vmf);
} else if (is_device_private_entry(entry)) {
+ if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK) {
+ /*
+ * migrate_to_ram is not yet ready to operate
+ * under VMA lock.
+ */
+ ret |= VM_FAULT_RETRY;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
vmf->page = pfn_swap_entry_to_page(entry);
vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd,
vmf->address, &vmf->ptl);
--
2.41.0.162.gfafddb0af9-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists