[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CT7XVY50ISCC.1I60H7POH94ES@suppilovahvero>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2023 10:26:00 +0300
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: "Roberto Sassu" <roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com>,
"Mengchi Cheng" <mengcc@...zon.com>
Cc: <miklos@...redi.hu>, <linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org>,
<kamatam@...zon.com>, <yoonjaeh@...zon.com>, <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
<dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>, <paul@...l-moore.com>,
<jmorris@...ei.org>, <serge@...lyn.com>,
<stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>, <eparis@...isplace.org>,
<casey@...aufler-ca.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, <selinux@...r.kernel.org>,
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
<keescook@...omium.org>, <nicolas.bouchinet@...p-os.org>,
"Roberto Sassu" <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/4] smack: Set the SMACK64TRANSMUTE xattr in
smack_inode_init_security()
On Mon Jun 5, 2023 at 11:38 AM EEST, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-06-03 at 21:15 +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
> >
> > With the newly added ability of LSMs to supply multiple xattrs, set
> > SMACK64TRASMUTE in smack_inode_init_security(), instead of d_instantiate().
nit: TRANSMUTE
Sorry, just hit into my eye. I skimmed it because I implemented original
feature :-)
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists