lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 09 Jun 2023 10:15:37 +0200
From:   Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>
To:     Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@...tq-group.com,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: dt-bindings: introduce linux,use-rt-queue flag

Hi all,

Am Freitag, 9. Juni 2023, 09:41:14 CEST schrieb Linus Walleij:
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 2:55 PM Matthias Schiffer
> 
> <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com> wrote:
> > It is not clear to me what alternative options we currently have if we
> > want a setting to be effective from the very beginning, before
> > userspace is running. Of course adding a cmdline option would work, but
> > that seems worse than having it in the DT in every possible way.
> 
> A agree with Mark that a command line option isn't that bad. It's something
> that pertains to just the Linux kernel after all? And you can put that
> command line option in the default device tree, in chosen, if you want.

I don't like the idea of a command line enabling realtime scheduling for all 
instances of the SPI controller driver or even all SPI controllers. Actually 
this might be worse if a non-rt SPI bus is considered for RT scheduling.
IMHO this should be configurable per SPI controller, e.g. a sysfs attribute.

> No-one is going to
> complain about that.

IIRC someone (maybe Greg K-H) opposed pretty hard against (module) parameters 
for (driver) configuration, but I can't find the post to back my statement.

Best regards,
Alexander

> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel


-- 
TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany
Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018
Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider
http://www.tq-group.com/


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ