[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230609082332.GJ8160@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 10:23:32 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cc: Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
Siarhei Volkau <lis8215@...il.com>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, list@...ndingux.net,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] MIPS: DTS: qi_lb60: Don't use unit address for
regulators
On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 02:26:55PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> The regulators don't have any "reg" property, and therefore shouldn't
> use an unit address in their node names.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
> ---
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
> Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/qi_lb60.dts | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
applied to mips-next.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists