lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaGDONmRNASF1UEnKHDrcNYtdHWJFMmqzP998mhc0WfAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Jun 2023 10:58:44 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: inline the first mmc_scan() on mmc_start_host()

On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 10:53 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 12:16:19AM -0700, Dennis Zhou wrote:

> > As a path forward I can add a command line flag as a bool to handle this
> > and that should hopefully take care of the regresion aspect to this.
>
> command line flags are horrible and should never be used.  Why can't you
> dynamically detect this type of thing and handle it that way?

If nothing else works, if this is device tree, a machine-specific quirk can be
done:

if (of_machine_is_compatible("vendor,machine")) {...}

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ