[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230609094643.26253-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 11:46:43 +0200
From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] posix-timers: refer properly to CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS
Commit c78f261e5dcb ("posix-timers: Clarify posix_timer_fn() comments")
turns an ifdef CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS into an conditional on
"IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHRES_TIMERS)"; note that the new conditional refers
to "HIGHRES_TIMERS" not "HIGH_RES_TIMERS" as before.
Fix this typo introduced in that refactoring.
Fixes: c78f261e5dcb ("posix-timers: Clarify posix_timer_fn() comments")
Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
---
kernel/time/posix-timers.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
index 8bb0dcf2e3d9..17fff6826a15 100644
--- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart posix_timer_fn(struct hrtimer *timer)
* enabled as the periodic tick based timers are
* automatically aligned to the next tick.
*/
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHRES_TIMERS)) {
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS)) {
ktime_t kj = TICK_NSEC;
if (timr->it_interval < kj)
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists