[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZIL5zehSOQTTXMBn@pc636>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 12:07:09 +0200
From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
To: Lu Hongfei <luhongfei@...o.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>,
"open list:VMALLOC" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
opensource.kernel@...o.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/vmalloc: Replace the ternary conditional operator
with min()
> It would be better to replace the traditional ternary conditional
> operator with min() in zero_iter
>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Hongfei <luhongfei@...o.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
> ---
> mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 29077d61ff81..6125ed506895
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -3571,7 +3571,7 @@ static size_t zero_iter(struct iov_iter *iter, size_t count)
> while (remains > 0) {
> size_t num, copied;
>
> - num = remains < PAGE_SIZE ? remains : PAGE_SIZE;
> + num = min_t(size_t, remains, PAGE_SIZE);
> copied = copy_page_to_iter_nofault(ZERO_PAGE(0), 0, num, iter);
> remains -= copied;
>
> --
> 2.39.0
>
I saw a complain from the robot. Indeed the min_t() variant is better:
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists