[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f40e9e7f-d655-be0d-3cdf-71c02614266f@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 14:02:45 +0300
From: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...il.com>
Cc: linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: Use bitfield values for range selectors
On 6/9/23 10:50, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Right now the regulator helpers expect raw register values for the range
> selectors. This is different from the voltage selectors, which are
> normalized as bitfield values. This leads to a bit of confusion. Also,
> raw values are harder to copy from datasheets or match up with them,
> as datasheets will typically have bitfield values.
>
> Make the helpers expect bitfield values, and convert existing users.
> Include bitops.h explicitly for ffs(), and reorder the header include
> statements. While at it, also replace module.h with export.h, since the
> only use is EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
For the helpers.c and bd718x7
Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Please ignore my tag in v1. I accidentally replied to wrong mail, the
tag was meant for v2. Thanks for the heads-up Mark.
Yours,
-- Matti
--
Matti Vaittinen
Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors
Oulu Finland
~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~
Powered by blists - more mailing lists