[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cf60ea04-057b-7856-3a30-775051cefa26@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 17:19:49 +0530
From: Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
"Michael Turquette" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>,
Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/5] clk: qcom: camcc-sm8550: Add camera clock
controller driver for SM8550
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for your review!
On 6/1/2023 8:21 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 01/06/2023 17:34, Jagadeesh Kona wrote:
>> Add support for the camera clock controller for camera clients to be
>> able to request for camcc clocks on SM8550 platform.
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since V2:
>> - No changes
>> Changes since V1:
>> - Sorted the PLL names in proper order
>> - Updated all PLL configurations to lower case hex
>> - Reused evo ops instead of adding new ops for ole pll
>> - Moved few clocks to separate patch to fix patch too long error
>>
>> drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig | 7 +
>> drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/clk/qcom/camcc-sm8550.c | 3405 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 3413 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/qcom/camcc-sm8550.c
>>
>
> [skipped]
>
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver cam_cc_sm8550_driver = {
>> + .probe = cam_cc_sm8550_probe,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "cam_cc-sm8550",
>> + .of_match_table = cam_cc_sm8550_match_table,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int __init cam_cc_sm8550_init(void)
>> +{
>> + return platform_driver_register(&cam_cc_sm8550_driver);
>> +}
>> +subsys_initcall(cam_cc_sm8550_init);
>> +
>> +static void __exit cam_cc_sm8550_exit(void)
>> +{
>> + platform_driver_unregister(&cam_cc_sm8550_driver);
>> +}
>> +module_exit(cam_cc_sm8550_exit);
>
> Please convert this to use module_platform_driver
>
We still have to evaluate if module_platform_driver() works for us in
all scenarios. We will post a cleanup patch once we conclude on
module_platform_driver().
>> +
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QTI CAMCC SM8550 Driver");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
Thanks & Regards,
Jagadeesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists