linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: timer: atmel,at91sam9260-pit: convert to yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5fc609e0-a70f-03e6-6ac2-db96a2ff7747@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 9 Jun 2023 14:18:02 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
        daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        wim@...ux-watchdog.org, linux@...ck-us.net
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: timer: atmel,at91sam9260-pit: convert
 to yaml

On 09/06/2023 14:09, Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>> interrupts? They are still required, so why no description here?
>>>
>>> It was here in the previous versions but Conor suggested to remove it as it
>>> was nothing specific about this description. For the if-then branch I kept
>>> it to specify that the interrupt is share with other devices. In this
>>> branch the interrupt is only for the timer itself. With this, would you
>>> still prefer to add it back?
>>
>> I just don't understand why interrupts are in one arm of the if: and not
>> in the other.
>>
> 
> As previously mentioned, Conor suggested to have it like this.
> 

ok

Best regards,
Krzysztof