linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6] sh: avoid using IRQ0 on SH3/4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 10 Jun 2023 13:24:56 +0300
From:   Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>
To:     John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
        Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] sh: avoid using IRQ0 on SH3/4

On 6/10/23 7:32 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:

>> IRQ0 is no longer returned by platform_get_irq() and its ilk -- they now
>> return -EINVAL instead.  However, the kernel code supporting SH3/4 based
>> SoCs still maps the IRQ #s starting at 0 -- modify that code to start the
>> IRQ #s from 16 instead.
>>
>> The patch should mostly affect the AP-SH4A-3A/AP-SH4AD-0A boards as they
>> indeed are using IRQ0 for the SMSC911x compatible Ethernet chip...
> 
> Do you mind if I remove the ellipsis at the end of this sentence when I merge
> this later today? I think it makes no sense from a grammatical point of view.

   No, I don't mind. :-)

> Adrian

MBR, Sergey