[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230610103958.jwfe45zm52ehiovn@intel.intel>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 12:39:58 +0200
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tty: serial: samsung_tty: Fix a memory leak in
s3c24xx_serial_getclk() when iterating clk
Hi Christophe,
On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 06:45:39AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> When the best clk is searched, we iterate over all possible clk.
>
> If we find a better match, the previous one, if any, needs to be freed.
> If a better match has already been found, we still need to free the new
> one, otherwise it leaks.
>
> Fixes: 5f5a7a5578c5 ("serial: samsung: switch to clkdev based clock lookup")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> This patch is speculative. Review with care.
>
> I think that some clk_put() are also missing somewhere else in the driver
> but won't be able to investigate further.
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> index dd751e7010e3..c07877dd25fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> @@ -1488,10 +1488,18 @@ static unsigned int s3c24xx_serial_getclk(struct s3c24xx_uart_port *ourport,
> calc_deviation = -calc_deviation;
>
> if (calc_deviation < deviation) {
> + /*
> + * If we find a better clk, release the previous one, if
> + * any.
> + */
> + if (!IS_ERR(*best_clk))
what is the case when *best_clk has an error in it?
Andi
> + clk_put(*best_clk);
> *best_clk = clk;
> best_quot = quot;
> *clk_num = cnt;
> deviation = calc_deviation;
> + } else {
> + clk_put(clk);
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists