[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <168640112909.404.8400459838695123810.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 12:45:29 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Wen Yang" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Wen Yang <wenyang.linux@...mail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: timers/core] tick/rcu: Fix bogus ratelimit condition
The following commit has been merged into the timers/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 5579a8a8f15bd08b731a015630daca6ccd0f8a14
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/5579a8a8f15bd08b731a015630daca6ccd0f8a14
Author: Wen Yang <wenyang.linux@...mail.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 05 May 2023 00:12:53 +08:00
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitterDate: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 14:36:17 +02:00
tick/rcu: Fix bogus ratelimit condition
The ratelimit logic in report_idle_softirq() is broken because the
exit condition is always true:
static int ratelimit;
if (ratelimit < 10)
return false; ---> always returns here
ratelimit++; ---> no chance to run
Make it check for >= 10 instead.
Fixes: 0345691b24c0 ("tick/rcu: Stop allowing RCU_SOFTIRQ in idle")
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wenyang.linux@...mail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/tencent_5AAA3EEAB42095C9B7740BE62FBF9A67E007@qq.com
---
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 5225467..8905505 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@ static bool report_idle_softirq(void)
return false;
}
- if (ratelimit < 10)
+ if (ratelimit >= 10)
return false;
/* On RT, softirqs handling may be waiting on some lock */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists