| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <6483d3b06bef6_e067a294ea@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 18:36:48 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>, <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
<vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
<bwidawsk@...nel.org>, <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
<dave.jiang@...el.com>, <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
<linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <terry.bowman@....com>, <rrichter@....com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 11/26] cxl/pci: Early setup RCH dport component
registers from RCRB
Terry Bowman wrote:
> From: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
>
> CXL RAS capabilities must be enabled and accessible as soon as the CXL
> endpoint is detected in the PCI hierarchy and bound to the cxl_pci
> driver. This needs to be independent of other modules such as cxl_port
> or cxl_mem.
>
> CXL RAS capabilities reside in the Component Registers. For an RCH
> this is determined by probing RCRB which is implemented very late once
> the CXL Memory Device is created.
>
> Change this by moving the RCRB probe to the cxl_pci driver. Do this by
> using a new introduced function cxl_pci_find_port() similar to
> cxl_mem_find_port() to determine the involved dport by the endpoint's
> PCI handle. Plug this into the existing cxl_pci_setup_regs() function
> to setup Component Registers. Probe the RCRB in case the Component
> Registers cannot be located through the CXL Register Locator
> capability.
>
> This unifies code and early sets up the Component Registers at the
> same time for both, VH and RCH mode. Only the cxl_pci driver is
> involved for this. This allows an early mapping of the CXL RAS
> capability registers.
This is problematic because it creates an implicit dependency between
cxl_acpi and cxl_pci. More comments below:
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/port.c | 7 +++++++
> drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 2 ++
> drivers/cxl/mem.c | 10 ----------
> drivers/cxl/pci.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> index 82de858506c7..8b688ac506ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> @@ -1476,6 +1476,13 @@ int devm_cxl_enumerate_ports(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(devm_cxl_enumerate_ports, CXL);
>
> +struct cxl_port *cxl_pci_find_port(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> + struct cxl_dport **dport)
> +{
> + return find_cxl_port(pdev->dev.parent, dport);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_pci_find_port, CXL);
> +
> struct cxl_port *cxl_mem_find_port(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd,
> struct cxl_dport **dport)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> index 1c6fe53e9dc7..e5ae5f4e6669 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -670,6 +670,8 @@ struct cxl_port *find_cxl_root(struct cxl_port *port);
> int devm_cxl_enumerate_ports(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd);
> void cxl_bus_rescan(void);
> void cxl_bus_drain(void);
> +struct cxl_port *cxl_pci_find_port(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> + struct cxl_dport **dport);
> struct cxl_port *cxl_mem_find_port(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd,
> struct cxl_dport **dport);
> bool schedule_cxl_memdev_detach(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd);
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/mem.c b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> index a34d6560c25c..0643852444f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> @@ -65,16 +65,6 @@ static int devm_cxl_add_endpoint(struct device *host, struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd,
> ep->next = down;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * The component registers for an RCD might come from the
> - * host-bridge RCRB if they are not already mapped via the
> - * typical register locator mechanism.
> - */
> - if (parent_dport->rch && cxlds->component_reg_phys == CXL_RESOURCE_NONE)
> - cxlds->component_reg_phys =
> - cxl_probe_rcrb(&cxlmd->dev, parent_dport->rcrb.base,
> - NULL, CXL_RCRB_UPSTREAM);
> -
> endpoint = devm_cxl_add_port(host, &cxlmd->dev,
> cxlds->component_reg_phys,
> parent_dport);
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> index 945ca0304d68..2975b232fcd1 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> @@ -274,13 +274,48 @@ static int cxl_pci_setup_mailbox(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/* Extract RCRB, use same function interface as cxl_find_regblock(). */
> +static int cxl_rcrb_get_comp_regs(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> + enum cxl_regloc_type type,
> + struct cxl_register_map *map)
> +{
> + struct cxl_dport *dport;
> + resource_size_t component_reg_phys;
> +
> + memset(map, 0, sizeof(*map));
> + map->dev = &pdev->dev;
> + map->resource = CXL_RESOURCE_NONE;
> +
> + if (type != CXL_REGLOC_RBI_COMPONENT)
> + return -ENODEV;
Why would a function called cxl_rcrb_get_comp_regs() need a type
parameter that only takes one acceptable value. I would drop the
parameter and move this distinction to the caller.
> +
> + if (!cxl_pci_find_port(pdev, &dport) || !dport->rch)
> + return -ENXIO;
This should return -EPROBE_DEFER in the !cxl_pci_find_port() case to try
to await cxl_acpi initialization.
> +
> + component_reg_phys = cxl_probe_rcrb(&pdev->dev, dport->rcrb.base,
> + NULL, CXL_RCRB_UPSTREAM);
> + if (component_reg_phys == CXL_RESOURCE_NONE)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
> + map->resource = component_reg_phys;
> + map->reg_type = type;
> + map->max_size = CXL_COMPONENT_REG_BLOCK_SIZE;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int cxl_pci_setup_regs(struct pci_dev *pdev, enum cxl_regloc_type type,
> struct cxl_register_map *map)
> {
> int rc;
>
> + /*
> + * If the Register Locator DVSEC does not contain the
> + * Component Registers, assume it is an RCH and try to extract
> + * them from an RCRB.
> + */
> rc = cxl_find_regblock(pdev, type, map);
> - if (rc)
> + if (rc && cxl_rcrb_get_comp_regs(pdev, type, map))
> return rc;
I am not a big fan of just assuming this is an RCD, especially when
there is the is_cxl_restricted() helper just beneath this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists