[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230610190655.5f3427a3@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 19:06:55 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@...labora.com>, lars@...afoo.de,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, heiko@...ech.de,
sebastian.reichel@...labora.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...labora.com, gustavo.padovan@...labora.com,
serge.broslavsky@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: iio: rockchip: Fix 'oneOf' condition
failed warning
On Sat, 10 Jun 2023 18:30:57 +0200
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 10/06/2023 16:36, Shreeya Patel wrote:
> > rk3588-saradc isn't compatible with the rk3399-saradc variant,
> > hence, fix the following dtbs_check warning for 'oneOf' condition
> > failure.
> >
>
> Are you sure it isn't compatible? According to your driver it is and
> this change is not enough.
I'm not following. the rk3588 has separate handling from the rk3399
Separate devices specific structure for instance
rk3588_saradc_data vs rk3399_saradc_data as provided as the match data for
the different compatibles..
Looks to be incompatible to me.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists