| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZITJw05MYgCjzLFx@gerhold.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 21:06:43 +0200
From: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 22/22] interconnect: qcom: icc-rpm: Fix bandwidth
calculations
On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 10:19:27PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Up until now, we've been aggregating the bandwidth values and only
> dividing them by the bus width of the source node. This was completely
> wrong, as different nodes on a given path may (and usually do) have
> varying bus widths. That in turn, resulted in the calculated clock rates
> being completely bogus - usually they ended up being much higher, as
> NoC_A<->NoC_B links are very wide.
>
> Since we're not using the aggregate bandwidth value for anything other
> than clock rate calculations, remodel qcom_icc_bus_aggregate() to
> calculate the per-context clock rate for a given provider, taking into
> account the bus width of every individual node.
>
> Fixes: 30c8fa3ec61a ("interconnect: qcom: Add MSM8916 interconnect provider driver")
> Reported-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c | 59 ++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c
> index 1508233632f6..d177a76abe2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c
> @@ -293,58 +293,44 @@ static int qcom_icc_bw_aggregate(struct icc_node *node, u32 tag, u32 avg_bw,
> }
>
> /**
> - * qcom_icc_bus_aggregate - aggregate bandwidth by traversing all nodes
> + * qcom_icc_bus_aggregate - calculate bus clock rates by traversing all nodes
> * @provider: generic interconnect provider
> - * @agg_avg: an array for aggregated average bandwidth of buckets
> - * @agg_peak: an array for aggregated peak bandwidth of buckets
> - * @max_agg_avg: pointer to max value of aggregated average bandwidth
> + * @agg_clk_rate: array containing the aggregated clock rates in kHz
> */
> -static void qcom_icc_bus_aggregate(struct icc_provider *provider,
> - u64 *agg_avg, u64 *agg_peak,
> - u64 *max_agg_avg)
> +static void qcom_icc_bus_aggregate(struct icc_provider *provider, u64 *agg_clk_rate)
> {
> - struct icc_node *node;
> + u64 agg_avg_rate, agg_rate;
> struct qcom_icc_node *qn;
> - u64 sum_avg[QCOM_SMD_RPM_STATE_NUM];
> + struct icc_node *node;
> int i;
>
> - /* Initialise aggregate values */
> - for (i = 0; i < QCOM_SMD_RPM_STATE_NUM; i++) {
> - agg_avg[i] = 0;
> - agg_peak[i] = 0;
> - }
> -
> - *max_agg_avg = 0;
> -
> /*
> - * Iterate nodes on the interconnect and aggregate bandwidth
> - * requests for every bucket.
> + * Iterate nodes on the provider, aggregate bandwidth requests for
> + * every bucket and convert them into bus clock rates.
> */
> list_for_each_entry(node, &provider->nodes, node_list) {
> qn = node->data;
> for (i = 0; i < QCOM_SMD_RPM_STATE_NUM; i++) {
> if (qn->channels)
> - sum_avg[i] = div_u64(qn->sum_avg[i], qn->channels);
> + agg_avg_rate = div_u64(qn->sum_avg[i], qn->channels);
> else
> - sum_avg[i] = qn->sum_avg[i];
> - agg_avg[i] += sum_avg[i];
> - agg_peak[i] = max_t(u64, agg_peak[i], qn->max_peak[i]);
> + agg_avg_rate = qn->sum_avg[i];
> +
> + agg_rate = max_t(u64, agg_avg_rate, qn->max_peak[i]);
> + do_div(agg_rate, qn->buswidth);
> +
> + agg_clk_rate[i] = max_t(u64, agg_clk_rate[i], agg_rate);
> }
> }
> -
> - /* Find maximum values across all buckets */
> - for (i = 0; i < QCOM_SMD_RPM_STATE_NUM; i++)
> - *max_agg_avg = max_t(u64, *max_agg_avg, agg_avg[i]);
> }
>
> static int qcom_icc_set(struct icc_node *src, struct icc_node *dst)
> {
> - struct qcom_icc_provider *qp;
> struct qcom_icc_node *src_qn = NULL, *dst_qn = NULL;
> + u64 agg_clk_rate[QCOM_SMD_RPM_STATE_NUM] = { 0 };
> struct icc_provider *provider;
> + struct qcom_icc_provider *qp;
> u64 active_rate, sleep_rate;
> - u64 agg_avg[QCOM_SMD_RPM_STATE_NUM], agg_peak[QCOM_SMD_RPM_STATE_NUM];
> - u64 max_agg_avg;
> int ret;
>
> src_qn = src->data;
> @@ -353,7 +339,9 @@ static int qcom_icc_set(struct icc_node *src, struct icc_node *dst)
> provider = src->provider;
> qp = to_qcom_provider(provider);
>
> - qcom_icc_bus_aggregate(provider, agg_avg, agg_peak, &max_agg_avg);
> + qcom_icc_bus_aggregate(provider, agg_clk_rate);
> + active_rate = agg_clk_rate[QCOM_SMD_RPM_ACTIVE_STATE];
> + sleep_rate = agg_clk_rate[QCOM_SMD_RPM_SLEEP_STATE];
>
> ret = qcom_icc_rpm_set(src_qn, src_qn->sum_avg);
> if (ret)
> @@ -369,15 +357,6 @@ static int qcom_icc_set(struct icc_node *src, struct icc_node *dst)
> if (!qp->bus_clk_desc && !qp->bus_clk)
> return 0;
>
> - /* Intentionally keep the rates in kHz as that's what RPM accepts */
I kind of liked this comment because otherwise it's not obvious why
you're not converting from "ICC units" anywhere.
Anyway:
Reviewed-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
Thanks for going through the giant maze to fix this!
Stephan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists