[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230610035053.117605-2-void@manifault.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 22:50:50 -0500
From: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...a.com, tj@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] selftests/bpf: Add test for new bpf_cpumask_first_and() kfunc
A prior patch added a new kfunc called bpf_cpumask_first_and() which
wraps cpumask_first_and(). This patch adds a selftest to validate its
behavior.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c | 1 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_common.h | 2 ++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
index d89191440fb1..756ea8b590b6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ static const char * const cpumask_success_testcases[] = {
"test_set_clear_cpu",
"test_setall_clear_cpu",
"test_first_firstzero_cpu",
+ "test_firstand_nocpu",
"test_test_and_set_clear",
"test_and_or_xor",
"test_intersects_subset",
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_common.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_common.h
index 0c5b785a93e4..b3493d5d263e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_common.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_common.h
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ void bpf_cpumask_release(struct bpf_cpumask *cpumask) __ksym;
struct bpf_cpumask *bpf_cpumask_acquire(struct bpf_cpumask *cpumask) __ksym;
u32 bpf_cpumask_first(const struct cpumask *cpumask) __ksym;
u32 bpf_cpumask_first_zero(const struct cpumask *cpumask) __ksym;
+u32 bpf_cpumask_first_and(const struct cpumask *src1,
+ const struct cpumask *src2) __ksym;
void bpf_cpumask_set_cpu(u32 cpu, struct bpf_cpumask *cpumask) __ksym;
void bpf_cpumask_clear_cpu(u32 cpu, struct bpf_cpumask *cpumask) __ksym;
bool bpf_cpumask_test_cpu(u32 cpu, const struct cpumask *cpumask) __ksym;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
index 602a88b03dbc..fbaf510f4ab5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
@@ -175,6 +175,38 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_first_firstzero_cpu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags
return 0;
}
+SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+int BPF_PROG(test_firstand_nocpu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
+{
+ struct bpf_cpumask *mask1, *mask2;
+ u32 first;
+
+ if (!is_test_task())
+ return 0;
+
+ mask1 = create_cpumask();
+ if (!mask1)
+ return 0;
+
+ mask2 = create_cpumask();
+ if (!mask2)
+ goto release_exit;
+
+ bpf_cpumask_set_cpu(0, mask1);
+ bpf_cpumask_set_cpu(1, mask2);
+
+ first = bpf_cpumask_first_and(cast(mask1), cast(mask2));
+ if (first <= 1)
+ err = 3;
+
+release_exit:
+ if (mask1)
+ bpf_cpumask_release(mask1);
+ if (mask2)
+ bpf_cpumask_release(mask2);
+ return 0;
+}
+
SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
int BPF_PROG(test_test_and_set_clear, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
{
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists