linux-kernel - [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] selftests/bpf: Update bpf_cpumask_any* tests to use bpf_cpumask_any

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230610035053.117605-4-void@manifault.com>
Date:   Fri,  9 Jun 2023 22:50:52 -0500
From:   David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>
To:     bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
        martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org, yhs@...com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com,
        haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...a.com, tj@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] selftests/bpf: Update bpf_cpumask_any* tests to use bpf_cpumask_any_distribute*

In a prior patch, we removed the bpf_cpumask_any() and
bpf_cpumask_any_and() kfuncs, and replaced them with
bpf_cpumask_any_distribute() and bpf_cpumask_any_distribute_and().
The advertised semantics between the two kfuncs were identical, with the
former always returning the first CPU, and the latter actually returning
any CPU.

This patch updates the selftests for these kfuncs to use the new names.

Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_common.h  | 4 ++--
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c | 8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_common.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_common.h
index b3493d5d263e..b15c588ace15 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_common.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_common.h
@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ bool bpf_cpumask_subset(const struct cpumask *src1, const struct cpumask *src2)
 bool bpf_cpumask_empty(const struct cpumask *cpumask) __ksym;
 bool bpf_cpumask_full(const struct cpumask *cpumask) __ksym;
 void bpf_cpumask_copy(struct bpf_cpumask *dst, const struct cpumask *src) __ksym;
-u32 bpf_cpumask_any(const struct cpumask *src) __ksym;
-u32 bpf_cpumask_any_and(const struct cpumask *src1, const struct cpumask *src2) __ksym;
+u32 bpf_cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *src) __ksym;
+u32 bpf_cpumask_any_and_distribute(const struct cpumask *src1, const struct cpumask *src2) __ksym;
 
 void bpf_rcu_read_lock(void) __ksym;
 void bpf_rcu_read_unlock(void) __ksym;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
index fbaf510f4ab5..674a63424dee 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
@@ -344,13 +344,13 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_copy_any_anyand, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 	bpf_cpumask_set_cpu(1, mask2);
 	bpf_cpumask_or(dst1, cast(mask1), cast(mask2));
 
-	cpu = bpf_cpumask_any(cast(mask1));
+	cpu = bpf_cpumask_any_distribute(cast(mask1));
 	if (cpu != 0) {
 		err = 6;
 		goto release_exit;
 	}
 
-	cpu = bpf_cpumask_any(cast(dst2));
+	cpu = bpf_cpumask_any_distribute(cast(dst2));
 	if (cpu < nr_cpus) {
 		err = 7;
 		goto release_exit;
@@ -362,13 +362,13 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_copy_any_anyand, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 		goto release_exit;
 	}
 
-	cpu = bpf_cpumask_any(cast(dst2));
+	cpu = bpf_cpumask_any_distribute(cast(dst2));
 	if (cpu > 1) {
 		err = 9;
 		goto release_exit;
 	}
 
-	cpu = bpf_cpumask_any_and(cast(mask1), cast(mask2));
+	cpu = bpf_cpumask_any_and_distribute(cast(mask1), cast(mask2));
 	if (cpu < nr_cpus) {
 		err = 10;
 		goto release_exit;
-- 
2.40.1