[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202306120220.hHmBq7QJ-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 02:43:10 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Johannes Roith <johannes@...-linux.rocks>, jikos@...nel.org
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Johannes Roith <johannes@...-linux.rocks>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hid-mcp2200 - updated hid-id.h
Hi Johannes,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on v6.4-rc5]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master next-20230609]
[cannot apply to hid/for-next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Johannes-Roith/hid-mcp2200-updated-hid-id-h/20230612-005025
base: v6.4-rc5
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230611164811.1388-2-johannes%40gnu-linux.rocks
patch subject: [PATCH 2/2] hid-mcp2200 - updated hid-id.h
config: um-x86_64_defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230612/202306120220.hHmBq7QJ-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 8dfdcc7b7bf66834a761bd8de445840ef68e4d1a)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
mkdir -p ~/bin
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# install um cross compiling tool for clang build
# apt-get install binutils-um-linux-gnu
git checkout v6.4-rc5
b4 shazam https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230611164811.1388-2-johannes@gnu-linux.rocks
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang ~/bin/make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=um olddefconfig
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang ~/bin/make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=um SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306120220.hHmBq7QJ-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/hid/hid-core.c:31:
In file included from include/linux/hid.h:29:
In file included from include/linux/hid_bpf.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/bpf.h:31:
In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24:
include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
#define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
^
In file included from drivers/hid/hid-core.c:31:
In file included from include/linux/hid.h:29:
In file included from include/linux/hid_bpf.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/bpf.h:31:
In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24:
include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
#define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
^
In file included from drivers/hid/hid-core.c:31:
In file included from include/linux/hid.h:29:
In file included from include/linux/hid_bpf.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/bpf.h:31:
In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24:
include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:692:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:700:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:708:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:717:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:726:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:735:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
In file included from drivers/hid/hid-core.c:36:
>> drivers/hid/hid-ids.h:915:9: warning: 'USB_DEVICE_ID_MCP2221' macro redefined [-Wmacro-redefined]
#define USB_DEVICE_ID_MCP2221 0x00df
^
drivers/hid/hid-ids.h:914:9: note: previous definition is here
#define USB_DEVICE_ID_MCP2221 0x00dd
^
13 warnings generated.
vim +/USB_DEVICE_ID_MCP2221 +915 drivers/hid/hid-ids.h
905
906 #define USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROCHIP 0x04d8
907 #define USB_DEVICE_ID_PICKIT1 0x0032
908 #define USB_DEVICE_ID_PICKIT2 0x0033
909 #define USB_DEVICE_ID_PICOLCD 0xc002
910 #define USB_DEVICE_ID_PICOLCD_BOOTLOADER 0xf002
911 #define USB_DEVICE_ID_PICK16F1454 0x0042
912 #define USB_DEVICE_ID_PICK16F1454_V2 0xf2f7
913 #define USB_DEVICE_ID_LUXAFOR 0xf372
914 #define USB_DEVICE_ID_MCP2221 0x00dd
> 915 #define USB_DEVICE_ID_MCP2221 0x00df
916
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists