[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230611090143.132257-2-frank@oltmanns.dev>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2023 11:01:42 +0200
From: Frank Oltmanns <frank@...manns.dev>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Frank Oltmanns <frank@...manns.dev>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Roman Beranek <me@...y.cz>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: sunxi-ng: nkm: consider alternative parent rates when finding rate
In case the CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag is set, consider using a different
parent rate when determining a new rate.
To find the best match for the requested rate, perform the following
steps for each NKM combination:
- calculate the optimal parent rate,
- find the best parent rate that the parent clock actually supports
- use that parent rate to calculate the effective rate.
In case the clk does not support setting the parent rate, use the same
algorithm as before.
Signed-off-by: Frank Oltmanns <frank@...manns.dev>
---
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
index a0978a50edae..c49d5879fe73 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/math.h>
#include "ccu_gate.h"
#include "ccu_nkm.h"
@@ -16,10 +17,49 @@ struct _ccu_nkm {
unsigned long m, min_m, max_m;
};
-static unsigned long ccu_nkm_find_best(unsigned long parent, unsigned long rate,
- struct _ccu_nkm *nkm)
+static unsigned long optimal_parent_rate(unsigned long rate, unsigned long n,
+ unsigned long k, unsigned long m)
{
- unsigned long best_rate = 0;
+ unsigned long _rate, parent;
+
+ // We must first try to find the desired parent rate that is rounded up, because there are
+ // cases where truncating makes us miss the requested rate.
+ // E.g. rate=449035712, n=11, k=3, m=16
+ // When truncating, we'd get parent=217714284 and calculating the rate from that would give
+ // us 449035710. When rounding up, we get parent=217714285 which would give us the requested
+ // rate of 449035712.
+ parent = DIV_ROUND_UP(rate * m, n * k);
+
+ // But there are other cases, where rounding up the parent gives us a too high rate.
+ // Therefore, we need to check for this case and, if necessary, truncate the parent rate
+ // instead of rounding up.
+ _rate = parent * n * k / m;
+ if (_rate > rate)
+ parent = rate * m / (n * k);
+ return parent;
+}
+
+/**
+ * ccu_nkm_find_best - Find the best nkm combination for a given rate
+ *
+ * @parent: rate of parent clock. This is used either as an input or out parameter:
+ * - In cases where the parent clock can be set, this parameter will be updated to contain
+ * the optimal rate for the parent to achieve the best rate for the nkm clock.
+ * - In cases where the parent clock can not be set, this parameter must contain the
+ * current rate of the parent, which is used to determine the best combination of n, k,
+ * and m.
+ * @rate: requested rate.
+ * @nkm: Input/output parameter that contains the clocks constraints on the n, k, m combinations and
+ * is updated in this function to contain the resulting best n, k, m combination.
+ * @parent_hw: parent clock. If set, this function assumes that the parent clock can be updated to a
+ * rate that would be best to in order to get as close as possible to @rate. This
+ * parameter must be set to NULL if this function shall not try to find the optimal
+ * parent rate for the requested rate.
+ */
+static unsigned long ccu_nkm_find_best(unsigned long *parent, unsigned long rate,
+ struct _ccu_nkm *nkm, struct clk_hw *parent_hw)
+{
+ unsigned long best_rate = 0, best_parent_rate = *parent, tmp_parent = *parent;
unsigned long best_n = 0, best_k = 0, best_m = 0;
unsigned long _n, _k, _m;
@@ -28,12 +68,17 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkm_find_best(unsigned long parent, unsigned long rate,
for (_m = nkm->min_m; _m <= nkm->max_m; _m++) {
unsigned long tmp_rate;
- tmp_rate = parent * _n * _k / _m;
-
+ if (parent_hw) {
+ tmp_parent = optimal_parent_rate(rate, _n, _k, _m);
+ tmp_parent = clk_hw_round_rate(parent_hw, tmp_parent);
+ }
+ tmp_rate = tmp_parent * _n * _k / _m;
if (tmp_rate > rate)
continue;
+
if ((rate - tmp_rate) < (rate - best_rate)) {
best_rate = tmp_rate;
+ best_parent_rate = tmp_parent;
best_n = _n;
best_k = _k;
best_m = _m;
@@ -46,6 +91,8 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkm_find_best(unsigned long parent, unsigned long rate,
nkm->k = best_k;
nkm->m = best_m;
+ *parent = best_parent_rate;
+
return best_rate;
}
@@ -106,7 +153,7 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkm_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
}
static unsigned long ccu_nkm_round_rate(struct ccu_mux_internal *mux,
- struct clk_hw *hw,
+ struct clk_hw *parent_hw,
unsigned long *parent_rate,
unsigned long rate,
void *data)
@@ -124,7 +171,10 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkm_round_rate(struct ccu_mux_internal *mux,
if (nkm->common.features & CCU_FEATURE_FIXED_POSTDIV)
rate *= nkm->fixed_post_div;
- rate = ccu_nkm_find_best(*parent_rate, rate, &_nkm);
+ if (!clk_hw_can_set_rate_parent(&nkm->common.hw))
+ rate = ccu_nkm_find_best(parent_rate, rate, &_nkm, NULL);
+ else
+ rate = ccu_nkm_find_best(parent_rate, rate, &_nkm, parent_hw);
if (nkm->common.features & CCU_FEATURE_FIXED_POSTDIV)
rate /= nkm->fixed_post_div;
@@ -159,7 +209,7 @@ static int ccu_nkm_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
_nkm.min_m = 1;
_nkm.max_m = nkm->m.max ?: 1 << nkm->m.width;
- ccu_nkm_find_best(parent_rate, rate, &_nkm);
+ ccu_nkm_find_best(&parent_rate, rate, &_nkm, NULL);
spin_lock_irqsave(nkm->common.lock, flags);
--
2.41.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists