[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZIcuiHIXsIXKHGFH@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 15:41:12 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jgowans@...zon.com, yuzhao@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 1/2] mm: compaction: convert to use a folio in
isolate_migratepages_block()
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 10:34:13PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> @@ -959,7 +960,8 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
> * Hugepage was successfully isolated and placed
> * on the cc->migratepages list.
> */
> - low_pfn += compound_nr(page) - 1;
> + folio = page_folio(page);
> + low_pfn += folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;
> goto isolate_success_no_list;
Why is this safe? That is, how do we know that the folio can't be
dissolved under us at this point, then reallocated and hit the
VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS(PageTail(page), page) in folio_flags() when we
test folio_test_large()?
> @@ -1132,30 +1137,30 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
> * and it's on LRU. It can only be a THP so the order
> * is safe to read and it's 0 for tail pages.
> */
^^^ This comment needs to be updated too.
> - mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(page),
> - NR_ISOLATED_ANON + page_is_file_lru(page),
> - thp_nr_pages(page));
> + lruvec_del_folio(lruvec, folio);
> + mod_node_page_state(folio_pgdat(folio),
> + NR_ISOLATED_ANON + folio_is_file_lru(folio),
> + folio_nr_pages(folio));
node_stat_mod_folio()
Powered by blists - more mailing lists