[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZIc7DJME7yDfrOf+@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 18:34:36 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@...isiblethingslab.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@...m.com>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Make sscanf() stricter
On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 04:40:40PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> Roger Pau Monné suggested making xenbus_scanf() stricter instead of
> using a custom parser. Christoph Hellwig asked why the normal vsscanf()
> cannot be made stricter. Richard Weinberger mentioned Linus Torvalds’s
> suggestion of using ! to allow overflow.
As Rasmus articulated, NAK w.o. test cases being added to all parts where your
changes touch.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists