linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND v7 00/11] PCI: dwc: Relatively simple fixes and cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230612154127.GA1335023@bhelgaas>
Date:   Mon, 12 Jun 2023 10:41:27 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v7 00/11] PCI: dwc: Relatively simple fixes and
 cleanups

On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 10:19:54PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> It turns out the recent DW PCIe-related patchset was merged in with
> several relatively trivial issues left unsettled (noted by Bjorn and
> Manivannan). All of these lefovers have been fixed in this patchset.
> Namely the series starts with two bug-fixes. The first one concerns the
> improper link-mode initialization in case if the CDM-check is enabled. The
> second unfortunate mistake I made in the IP-core version type helper. In
> particular instead of testing the IP-core version type the macro function
> referred to the just IP-core version which obviously wasn't what I
> intended.
> ...

I am unable to do anything with this series.

Google's legal team is reviewing this matter under applicable laws and
regulations.

Bjorn