linux-kernel - Re: [6.5-rc5 regression] core dump hangs (was Re: [Bug report] fstests generic/051 (on xfs) hang on latest linux v6.5-rc5+)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87zg54r83e.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org>
Date:   Mon, 12 Jun 2023 10:52:37 -0500
From:   "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
To:     "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Zorro Lang <zlang@...hat.com>, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        Mike Christie <michael.christie@...cle.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [6.5-rc5 regression] core dump hangs (was Re: [Bug report]
 fstests generic/051 (on xfs) hang on latest linux v6.5-rc5+)


Can someone who can reproduce the hang run this test patch.

I am currently drawing a blank looking at the changes, so I am
proposing some debug code to help us narrow things down.

Can someone who can reproduce this run the code below?

The tests reproducing this don't appear to use use /dev/host-net or
/dev/vhost-vsock.  So if the WARN_ON's trigger it is a good sign
that code connected to the WARN_ON's are wrong.

If the WARN_ON's don't trigger I suspect the code in kernel/fork.c

But as I said staring at the code I don't see anything wrong.

Eric


diff --git a/fs/coredump.c b/fs/coredump.c
index 88740c51b942..e9acf0a2d2f0 100644
--- a/fs/coredump.c
+++ b/fs/coredump.c
@@ -374,6 +374,7 @@ static int zap_process(struct task_struct *start, int exit_code)
 			/* The vhost_worker does not particpate in coredumps */
 			if ((t->flags & (PF_USER_WORKER | PF_IO_WORKER)) != PF_USER_WORKER)
 				nr++;
+			else WARN_ON_ONCE(true);
 		}
 	}
 
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index edb50b4c9972..56002a58ec33 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -437,6 +437,7 @@ static void coredump_task_exit(struct task_struct *tsk)
 		}
 		__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
 	}
+	else if (core_state) WARN_ON_ONCE(true);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 2547fa73bde5..1be27dbbce62 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1371,6 +1371,7 @@ int zap_other_threads(struct task_struct *p)
 		/* Don't require de_thread to wait for the vhost_worker */
 		if ((t->flags & (PF_IO_WORKER | PF_USER_WORKER)) != PF_USER_WORKER)
 			count++;
+		else WARN_ON_ONCE(true);
 
 		/* Don't bother with already dead threads */
 		if (t->exit_state)