[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZIdXL2Net/5ttmXB@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 20:34:39 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Alexander Stein <linux@...tq-group.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc, rft, PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: aggregator: Introduce delay
support for individual output pins
On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 09:50:37AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 6:22 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > The aggregator mode can also handle properties of the platform, that
> > do not belong to the GPIO controller itself. One of such a property
> > is signal delay line. Intdoduce support of it.
> (...)
> > I don't like the idea of gpio-delay or similar. We have already GPIO
> > aggregator that incorporates the GPIO proxy / forwarder functionality.
>
> You are right. This is the right solution going forward IMO.
Thank you for the support.
Take into consideration 1 kinda neutral and 2 for votes, I'll going to split
and improve the patch (series).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists