[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0higwL64NP4tFfOwVog1daSBsUTdh+M5ocZqDi14cYVDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 19:50:19 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
lkp <lkp@...el.com>,
"llvm@...ts.linux.dev" <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev" <oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powercap: intel_rapl: Fix CONFIG_IOSF_MBI dependency
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 4:23 AM Zhang, Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-06-06 at 23:45 +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > Hi Zhang,
> >
> > kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
> >
> > [auto build test ERROR on rafael-pm/linux-next]
> > [also build test ERROR on next-20230606]
> > [cannot apply to linus/master v6.4-rc5]
> > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a
> > note.
> > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented
> > in
> > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
> >
> > url:
> > https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Zhang-Rui/powercap-intel_rapl-Fix-CONFIG_IOSF_MBI-dependency/20230606-220222
>
> This is a false alarm from the robot.
> It applied Arnd' patch first and then applied this patch on top.
>
> I think we can ignore the lkp robot warnings for this thread.
OK
Applied as 6.5 material, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists