[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xm26fs6w9zt4.fsf@google.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 13:43:35 -0700
From: Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
To: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/nohz: Add HRTICK_BW for using cfs bandwidth
with nohz_full
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com> writes:
> CFS bandwidth limits and NOHZ full don't play well together. Tasks
> can easily run well past their quotas before a remote tick does
> accounting. This leads to long, multi-period stalls before such
> tasks can run again. Use the hrtick mechanism to set a sched
> tick to fire at remaining_runtime in the future if we are on
> a nohz full cpu, if the task has quota and if we are likely to
> disable the tick (nr_running == 1). This allows for bandwidth
> accounting before tasks go too far over quota.
>
> A number of container workloads use a dynamic number of real
> nohz tasks but also have other work that is limited which ends
> up running on the "spare" nohz cpus. This is an artifact of
> having to specify nohz_full cpus at boot. Adding this hrtick
> resolves the issue of long stalls on these tasks. Currently
> the scheduler, when faced with these conflicting requirements
> choosed to favor nohz_full even though that is already best
> effort. Here we make it favor respecting the bandwidth
> limitations which are not supposed to be best effort.
>
> Add the sched_feat HRTICK_BW off by default to allow users to
> enable this only when needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
> Suggested-by: Juri Lelli <jlelli@...hat.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
> Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
> ---
>
> v2: Clean up building issues with various related CONFIG changes. Add a
> check to start the hrtick in __account_cfs_rq_runtime() for when the
> task gets more runtime.
This starts the hrtick before/without going through schedule, but the
fact that it's still the standard hrtick()->task_tick(queued=1) means it
will still set need_resched even if it succeeds at getting runtime.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists