linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 nolibc 27/53] tools/nolibc: ensure stack protector guard is never zero

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230612204514.292087-27-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 12 Jun 2023 13:44:48 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     gwml@...r.gnuweeb.org, kernel-team@...a.com, w@....eu,
        Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
        Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 nolibc 27/53] tools/nolibc: ensure stack protector guard is never zero

From: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>

The all-zero pattern is one of the more probable out-of-bound writes so
add a special case to not accidentally accept it.

Also it enables the reliable detection of stack protector initialization
during testing.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
 tools/include/nolibc/stackprotector.h | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/stackprotector.h b/tools/include/nolibc/stackprotector.h
index 77e5251c4490..b0156fc077a0 100644
--- a/tools/include/nolibc/stackprotector.h
+++ b/tools/include/nolibc/stackprotector.h
@@ -45,8 +45,9 @@ __attribute__((weak,no_stack_protector,section(".text.nolibc_stack_chk")))
 void __stack_chk_init(void)
 {
 	my_syscall3(__NR_getrandom, &__stack_chk_guard, sizeof(__stack_chk_guard), 0);
-	/* a bit more randomness in case getrandom() fails */
-	__stack_chk_guard ^= (uintptr_t) &__stack_chk_guard;
+	/* a bit more randomness in case getrandom() fails, ensure the guard is never 0 */
+	if (__stack_chk_guard != (uintptr_t) &__stack_chk_guard)
+		__stack_chk_guard ^= (uintptr_t) &__stack_chk_guard;
 }
 #endif /* defined(NOLIBC_STACKPROTECTOR) */
 
-- 
2.40.1