linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2] ftrace: Show all functions with addresses in available_filter_functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 12 Jun 2023 19:31:59 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...a.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        Jackie Liu <liu.yun@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] ftrace: Show all functions with addresses in
 available_filter_functions_addrs

On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 16:28:49 -0700
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> wrote:


> If Steven would be ok with it, can we land this change through the
> bpf-next tree? Then we can have BPF selftest added in the same patch
> set that parses a new file and uses bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi()
> to attach using explicit addresses.
> 
> This should make it clear to everyone how this is meant to be used and
> will be a good test that everything works end-to-end.
> 

This touches some of the code I'm working with, so I rather have it be in
my tree.

-- Steve