[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZIax1FLfNajWk25A@dread.disaster.area>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 15:49:08 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Zorro Lang <zlang@...hat.com>, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Mike Christie <michael.christie@...cle.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [6.5-rc5 regression] core dump hangs (was Re: [Bug report]
fstests generic/051 (on xfs) hang on latest linux v6.5-rc5+)
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 10:34:29PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 10:16 PM Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:
> >
> > > + /* vhost workers don't participate in core dups */
> > > + if ((current->flags & (PF_IO_WORKER | PF_USER_WORKER)) != PF_USER_WORKER)
> > > + goto out;
> > > +
> >
> > That would appear to make things worse. mkfs.xfs hung in Z state on
> > exit and never returned to the shell.
>
> Well, duh, that's because I'm a complete nincompoop who just copied
> the condition from the other cases, but those other cases were for
> testing the "this is *not* a vhost worker".
>
> Here the logic - as per the comment I added - was supposed to be "is
> this a vhost worker".
>
> So that "!=" should obviously have been a "==".
Same as without the condition - all the fsstress tasks hang in
do_coredump().
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists