linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ata: ahci_platform: Make code agnostic to OF/ACPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZIbgLIEylgZsxXAB@kekkonen.localdomain>
Date:   Mon, 12 Jun 2023 09:06:52 +0000
From:   Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
        Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ata: ahci_platform: Make code agnostic to OF/ACPI

Hi Andy,

On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 06:49:00PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> With the help of a new device_is_compatible() make
> the driver code agnostic to the OF/ACPI. This makes
> it neater. As a side effect the header inclusions is
> corrected (seems mod_devicetable.h was implicitly
> included).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> index ab30c7138d73..81fc63f6b008 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> @@ -9,14 +9,14 @@
>   */
>  
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/pm.h>
>  #include <linux/device.h>
> -#include <linux/of_device.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/property.h>
>  #include <linux/libata.h>
>  #include <linux/ahci_platform.h>
> -#include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/pci_ids.h>
>  #include "ahci.h"
>  
> @@ -56,10 +56,10 @@ static int ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (rc)
>  		return rc;
>  
> -	if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "hisilicon,hisi-ahci"))
> +	if (device_is_compatible(dev, "hisilicon,hisi-ahci"))
>  		hpriv->flags |= AHCI_HFLAG_NO_FBS | AHCI_HFLAG_NO_NCQ;
>  
> -	port = acpi_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +	port = device_get_match_data(dev);

There are just a handful of users for acpi_device_get_match_data() in the
tree. The code could be moved to acpi_fwnode_device_get_match_data() after
coverting these. May be out of scope of this set though.

>  	if (!port)
>  		port = &ahci_port_info;
>  

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus