[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023061226-footgear-kooky-cb04@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 11:13:40 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/159] 5.15.116-rc1 review
On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 12:31:04PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 6/9/23 12:06, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 11:42 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > I managed to revise my bisect script sufficiently enough to get reliable
> > > results. It looks like the culprit is commit 503e554782c9 (" debugobject:
> > > Ensure pool refill (again)"); see bisect log below. Bisect on four
> > > different systems all have the same result. After reverting this patch,
> > > I do not see the problem anymore (again, confirmed on four different
> > > systems).
> >
> > Does this happen on mainline too? It's commit 0af462f19e63 in the upstream tree.
> >
> > It was in 6.4-rc1, and I see a clean result from you at least for
> > -rc2, so for some reason it sounds like upstream is ok. But I don't
> > really see why that would be the case...
> >
>
> I see the problem only in v5.15.y, to the point where it is almost
> impossible to get a clean test of all arm-v7 systems. Affected are
> npcm (Nuvoton) boards (kudo-bmc, quanta-gsj, npcm750-evb) as well as
> orangepi-pc. I don't see it in any other branch or with any other
> platform/architecture.
>
> Mainline is fine; I have not seen any problems since -rc2.
>
> I have no idea what is going on either, only that I can reliably
> reproduce the problem (and of course it disappears if CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS
> is disabled).
Ok, I've reverted it from 5.15.y for now until this is figured out.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists