[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230612093537.693926033@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 11:07:17 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, pbonzini@...hat.com
Cc: masahiroy@...nel.org, nathan@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
nicolas@...sle.eu, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
vkoul@...nel.org, trix@...hat.com, ojeda@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, longman@...hat.com,
boqun.feng@...il.com, dennis@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org,
cl@...ux.com, acme@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, frederic@...nel.org, quic_neeraju@...cinc.com,
joel@...lfernandes.org, josh@...htriplett.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, vbabka@...e.cz, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
42.hyeyoo@...il.com, apw@...onical.com, joe@...ches.com,
dwaipayanray1@...il.com, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com,
john.johansen@...onical.com, paul@...l-moore.com,
jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, ravi.bangoria@....com, error27@...il.com,
luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/57] kbuild: Drop -Wdeclaration-after-statement
With the advent on scope-based resource management it comes really
tedious to abide by the contraints of -Wdeclaration-after-statement.
It will still be recommeneded to place declarations at the start of a
scope where possible, but it will no longer be enforced.
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
Makefile | 6 +-----
arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile | 2 --
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -447,8 +447,7 @@ HOSTRUSTC = rustc
HOSTPKG_CONFIG = pkg-config
KBUILD_USERHOSTCFLAGS := -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes \
- -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -std=gnu11 \
- -Wdeclaration-after-statement
+ -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -std=gnu11
KBUILD_USERCFLAGS := $(KBUILD_USERHOSTCFLAGS) $(USERCFLAGS)
KBUILD_USERLDFLAGS := $(USERLDFLAGS)
@@ -1012,9 +1011,6 @@ endif
# arch Makefile may override CC so keep this after arch Makefile is included
NOSTDINC_FLAGS += -nostdinc
-# warn about C99 declaration after statement
-KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wdeclaration-after-statement
-
# Variable Length Arrays (VLAs) should not be used anywhere in the kernel
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wvla
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile
@@ -65,11 +65,9 @@ VDSO_CFLAGS += -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-pr
-fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common \
-Werror-implicit-function-declaration \
-Wno-format-security \
- -Wdeclaration-after-statement \
-std=gnu11
VDSO_CFLAGS += -O2
# Some useful compiler-dependent flags from top-level Makefile
-VDSO_CFLAGS += $(call cc32-option,-Wdeclaration-after-statement,)
VDSO_CFLAGS += $(call cc32-option,-Wno-pointer-sign)
VDSO_CFLAGS += -fno-strict-overflow
VDSO_CFLAGS += $(call cc32-option,-Werror=strict-prototypes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists