[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230612093538.225353309@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 11:07:24 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, pbonzini@...hat.com
Cc: masahiroy@...nel.org, nathan@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
nicolas@...sle.eu, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
vkoul@...nel.org, trix@...hat.com, ojeda@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, longman@...hat.com,
boqun.feng@...il.com, dennis@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org,
cl@...ux.com, acme@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, frederic@...nel.org, quic_neeraju@...cinc.com,
joel@...lfernandes.org, josh@...htriplett.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, vbabka@...e.cz, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
42.hyeyoo@...il.com, apw@...onical.com, joe@...ches.com,
dwaipayanray1@...il.com, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com,
john.johansen@...onical.com, paul@...l-moore.com,
jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, ravi.bangoria@....com, error27@...il.com,
luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 11/57] sched: Simplify sched_tick_remote()
Use guards to reduce gotos and simplify control flow.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5651,9 +5651,6 @@ static void sched_tick_remote(struct wor
struct tick_work *twork = container_of(dwork, struct tick_work, work);
int cpu = twork->cpu;
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
- struct task_struct *curr;
- struct rq_flags rf;
- u64 delta;
int os;
/*
@@ -5663,30 +5660,26 @@ static void sched_tick_remote(struct wor
* statistics and checks timeslices in a time-independent way, regardless
* of when exactly it is running.
*/
- if (!tick_nohz_tick_stopped_cpu(cpu))
- goto out_requeue;
+ if (tick_nohz_tick_stopped_cpu(cpu)) {
+ guard(rq_lock_irq)(rq);
+ struct task_struct *curr = rq->curr;
+
+ if (cpu_online(cpu)) {
+ update_rq_clock(rq);
+
+ if (!is_idle_task(curr)) {
+ /*
+ * Make sure the next tick runs within a
+ * reasonable amount of time.
+ */
+ u64 delta = rq_clock_task(rq) - curr->se.exec_start;
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(delta > (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC * 3);
+ }
+ curr->sched_class->task_tick(rq, curr, 0);
- rq_lock_irq(rq, &rf);
- curr = rq->curr;
- if (cpu_is_offline(cpu))
- goto out_unlock;
-
- update_rq_clock(rq);
-
- if (!is_idle_task(curr)) {
- /*
- * Make sure the next tick runs within a reasonable
- * amount of time.
- */
- delta = rq_clock_task(rq) - curr->se.exec_start;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(delta > (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC * 3);
+ calc_load_nohz_remote(rq);
+ }
}
- curr->sched_class->task_tick(rq, curr, 0);
-
- calc_load_nohz_remote(rq);
-out_unlock:
- rq_unlock_irq(rq, &rf);
-out_requeue:
/*
* Run the remote tick once per second (1Hz). This arbitrary
Powered by blists - more mailing lists