linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 14/57] sched: Simplify set_user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230612093538.465891562@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 12 Jun 2023 11:07:27 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, pbonzini@...hat.com
Cc:     masahiroy@...nel.org, nathan@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
        nicolas@...sle.eu, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
        vkoul@...nel.org, trix@...hat.com, ojeda@...nel.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, longman@...hat.com,
        boqun.feng@...il.com, dennis@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org,
        cl@...ux.com, acme@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
        namhyung@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
        juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
        mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
        paulmck@...nel.org, frederic@...nel.org, quic_neeraju@...cinc.com,
        joel@...lfernandes.org, josh@...htriplett.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
        rientjes@...gle.com, vbabka@...e.cz, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
        42.hyeyoo@...il.com, apw@...onical.com, joe@...ches.com,
        dwaipayanray1@...il.com, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com,
        john.johansen@...onical.com, paul@...l-moore.com,
        jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, ravi.bangoria@....com, error27@...il.com,
        luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 14/57] sched: Simplify set_user_nice()

Use guards to reduce gotos and simplify control flow.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c  |   13 ++++++-------
 kernel/sched/sched.h |    5 +++++
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -7119,9 +7119,8 @@ static inline int rt_effective_prio(stru
 void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice)
 {
 	bool queued, running;
-	int old_prio;
-	struct rq_flags rf;
 	struct rq *rq;
+	int old_prio;
 
 	if (task_nice(p) == nice || nice < MIN_NICE || nice > MAX_NICE)
 		return;
@@ -7129,7 +7128,9 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p
 	 * We have to be careful, if called from sys_setpriority(),
 	 * the task might be in the middle of scheduling on another CPU.
 	 */
-	rq = task_rq_lock(p, &rf);
+	CLASS(task_rq_lock, rq_guard)(p);
+	rq = rq_guard.rq;
+
 	update_rq_clock(rq);
 
 	/*
@@ -7140,8 +7141,9 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p
 	 */
 	if (task_has_dl_policy(p) || task_has_rt_policy(p)) {
 		p->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(nice);
-		goto out_unlock;
+		return;
 	}
+
 	queued = task_on_rq_queued(p);
 	running = task_current(rq, p);
 	if (queued)
@@ -7164,9 +7166,6 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p
 	 * lowered its priority, then reschedule its CPU:
 	 */
 	p->sched_class->prio_changed(rq, p, old_prio);
-
-out_unlock:
-	task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_user_nice);
 
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1630,6 +1630,11 @@ task_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq, struct tas
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, rf->flags);
 }
 
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(task_rq_lock, struct task_struct,
+		    _T->rq = task_rq_lock(_T->lock, &_T->rf),
+		    task_rq_unlock(_T->rq, _T->lock, &_T->rf),
+		    struct rq *rq; struct rq_flags rf)
+
 static inline void
 rq_lock_irqsave(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
 	__acquires(rq->lock)